Evaluating user request

\n

I need to check if the network might be enabled, but I can't rely on that. I remember our knowledge cutoff is in October 2024, which means I can’t speak to 2025 events. The user's message may relate to current Chinese sports news, possibly about Bastoni’s comments on being proud of his Champions League finals. To stay accurate, I should avoid hallucinations. I think asking whether they want a translation, context, or analysis could be useful!Offering tactical analysis

I think I should ask the user if they want a summary or a tactical analysis, and I can include examples of Bastoni’s progressive passing, carrying, crossing, assists, and heatmap. I can compare his defensive and build-up stats from the 2023-24 season, but I can only describe those qualitatively since I can’t fetch stats offline.

\n

I can provide a quick tactical analysis based on his role as LCB in a 3-5-2, noting specific plays from his UCL run, like the assist to Barella against Benfica.Structuring user options

I feel good about providing options based on 2023 memory without venturing into Euro 2020. I can offer: 1) An English translation along with a headline rewrite; 2) A concise tactical profile in about 4-5 bullet points; and 3) If they ask for an original source link, I can look it up if network access is permitted.

I know the network is set to [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;enabled[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; by default, but I should only fetch information upon request. My final response will be concise and structured as a bullet list that includes a translation, context on Bastoni’s role at Inter, and an example of his assist against Benfica without precise stats.Crafting user response

It's good to keep my response general and safe. I'll first ask the user what they want: whether they're looking for a deeper tactical breakdown, comparisons, or if they want to verify the detail about [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;two finals in three years.[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; I can acknowledge that they made it to the finals in 2023, with the second possibly referring to 2025. I'll also confirm the timeframe to show I'm aware of my knowledge cutoff. Since the user communicates in Chinese, I'll respond in that language and keep it brief.